On Apr 07, martin f krafft <madd...@debian.org> wrote: > is your position unchanged? Yes, since the arguments against this configuration that have been presented so far can be summarized in "OMG Google!!!1!".
So far the current default looks like a reliable and secure one, and as the package maintainer I do not believe that removing the feature of a last resort fail-safe preconfigured DNS resolver would be "no default" would improve the quality of Debian. If you feel the need to further pursue this then please explain in detail the threat model that you are trying to address and how the current default configuration would be worse than other default configurations. -- ciao, Marco
pgpuKytoddR4n.pgp
Description: PGP signature
