Hi, Paul Wise <p...@debian.org> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 9:04 PM, Holger Wansing wrote: > > > It came to my mind if it would be legally correct, to mark translaions of > > the Debian Constitution as translations and therefore as not legally valid? > > The Debian Project is not a legal entity and the Debian Constitution > is not a legal document, just a set of rules the Debian Project > governs itself by. > > I think it is reasonable to have the constitution translated, as long > as out-of-date translations are clearly marked. Currently they are not > marked properly. I expect the outdatedness feature of the website > needs to be adjusted to allow for per-page age preferences.
Today it came to my notice, that adding a line like #use wml::debian::translation-check translation="1.xxx" mindelta="1" maxdelta="1" would do the job. Shall I add that to the translations? (there are still some outdated ones ATM). I think it wouldn't hurt... Holger -- ============================================================ Created with Sylpheed 3.2.0 under D E B I A N L I N U X 7 . 0 W H E E Z Y ! Registered Linux User #311290 - https://linuxcounter.net/ ============================================================ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org