On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 04:47:50PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > > Moreover the current version has some problems that I'd not like to > > > see enter testing at all.
> > Current testing has an RC security bug. If those issues you mention > > are also RC, I suggest you document them in the BTS, since I didn't > > find any other RC issues in the tracker. If they are not, this > > version should progress in order to fix the RC security bug in > > testing that's absent in unstable. > you are right on the full line, and I just did an upload of what I > should have done way earlier and that was almost ready on my computer. > thise one fixes a lot of bugs and use the update that upstream released > a few day after I fixed the RC bug in a hurry. > -6 is the package that will fix all that should be, and it'll enter etch > in 10 days from now. If this fixes a release critical security bug, *why* are we treating it with urgency=low? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
