Dear Andreas, Le 20/05/2015 10:43, Andreas Henriksson a écrit : > Hello Thibaut Paumard! > > Thanks for bringing this issue to my attention. > > On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 10:00:21AM +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote: >> Control: found -1 util-linux/2.26.2-3 >> >> Hi, >> >> util-linux still FTBFS on kfreebsd: >> >> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=util-linux&arch=kfreebsd-amd64&ver=2.26.2-3&stamp=1431709753 >> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=util-linux&arch=kfreebsd-i386&ver=2.26.2-3&stamp=1431709826 > > The issue in the build logs seems completely different from the one > in the bug report you hijacked.... Please open your own bug reports > instead of recycling already fixed bug reports.
Thanks for your time and efforts. Sorry if the way I signaled the issue to you does not correspond to your expectaions, I'll do better next time. > Also, patches welcome. (Preferrably kfreebsd porters gets someone to > look after util-linux upstream.... Look at how the hurd porters work!) I'm not perticularly interested in the kfreebsd ports, thanks. However, linux-utils failing to build on kfreedbsd makes sysvrc-utils uninstallable on this arch, which in turns causes other packages to FTBFS on kfreebsd, which blocks them from migrating to testing since kfreebsd is a release arch. Therefore this is a pretty serious issue, and unfortunately I do not have the time to dive into the code and provide a patch right know. Kind regards, Thibaut. > Regards, > Andreas Henriksson > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
