On 08/03/2015 11:09 AM, Arto Jantunen wrote: > Control: block -1 by 793215 > > Matthias Klose <d...@debian.org> writes: >> GCC PR libstdc++/66145 is a regression in GCC 5 which won't be fixed >> upstream in time for the GCC defaults change. The work around is to >> rebuild the affected packages after GCC 5 is the default compiler. >> Please look at the code and decide, if the package is affected. If >> not, please just close the issue. If it's a real issue, I'll add >> the packages affected to libstdc++6's Breaks attributes, with the >> version of the package at the time of the defaults change. > > AFAICT sqlitebrowser inherits this issue from antlr, and thus that needs > to be rebuilt before anything can be done for sqlitebrowser. > > Will libstdc++ generate tight enough dependencies to prevent partial > upgrades, or would antlr need to do the Breaks dance with its rdeps?
no. not by default. so it's probably better if antlr breaks all libantlr-dev rdeps? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
