On 05.08.2015 18:55, Mark Wielaard wrote: > On Wed, 2015-08-05 at 11:13 +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote: >> Note that the ELF object is actually created in LLVM. > > Do you happen to know whether that also uses libelf to generate the > file?
AFAICT LLVM doesn't use libelf, presumably it has its own ELF code. > I am assuming there is some bug in the relocation section parsing > and that the generated ELF images are identical in the old/new > situation. But maybe the ELF images generated are actually different? > Kai, would it be possible to run the tweaked code to dump the ELF images > to disk against both the old/new libelf and see if they differ? I can't speak for Kai, but I didn't change anything about LLVM between the failing and working case, so the generated ELF objects should be identical in both cases. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
