Hi Vincent, Vincent Bernat wrote: > >> They change their locations, > > > > Now no more. For you, they're only inside ieee-data from now on. No > > need to track upstream locations anymore. > > Except that since the introduction of ieee-data, the location in the > package has at least changed twice.
Oops. Didn't know that. > That's fine, we can't get everything right on the first time. But > this is what I meaned when I said they change their locations. I see. > > All things which can be fixed. And once they are fixed, they're fixed > > once and forever and will bother you less often than they do now. > > I have a pretty simple package and half of debian/rules is handling this > ieee-data thing and you propose to add a lot more. No, I propose to move that part into a maintainer script. > All additional code will come with additional bugs that I will have > to handle. I just don't have the bandwidth for that. Not sure how similar this is, but I plan to do that for arpwatch (which is currently orphaned). Maybe that implementation can work as pattern for you once it's there. Regards, Axel -- ,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/ : :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin `. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5 `- | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org