Hi, Guido Günther wrote (21 Aug 2015 08:37:53 GMT) : > On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 09:08:46AM +0200, intrigeri wrote: >> Felix Geyer wrote (20 Aug 2015 09:18:59 GMT) : >> > The deny rules aren't strictly necessary but they silence those (harmless) >> > denials. >> >> Thanks for the clarification. I don't think that silencing harmless denials >> qualifies for a stable pu.
> Great. Can one of you add this to #796088 - I did but it might make > sense if somebody with more apparmor skills does. The path I would prefer is: submit an updated debdiff that does not contain these bonus "deny" rules. I could prepare it if we agree on that, assuming the current state of this stable pu is in Vcs-Git. But if someone else disagrees and prefers to argue in favour of including these changes in the stable pu, feel free to do so :) Cheers, -- intrigeri
