Am 05.10.2015 um 12:07 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: > On Sun, 04 Oct 2015 17:10:40 +0200 Gilles Filippini <p...@debian.org> wrote: > >> Setting back severity to grave because ppc64el is an official >> architecture since novembre 2014 and there is no point in providing >> gluegen2 for ppc64el if it is unusable. > > On the other hand, the affected architectures have a combined popcon of > 0.3%. I don't think it's fair to push the severity to serious and risk a > removal that would affect all the other architectures.
I think we should determine if upstream supports ppc64el. If not, it is reasonable to remove ppc64el and other affected ports from the Architecture field. Regards, Markus
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
