I initially went for the 'apt-get install' solution to keep the disk footprint down by only installing hardware dependent packages on the hardware that needed it. What is the reason for going with the dependency approach instead?
[James Valleroy] > Sunil suggested moving the hardware setup script to freedom-maker > instead. Then freedombox-setup can focus on configuring a Debian install > as a FreedomBox, while freedom-maker can handle making bootable images > for various hardware targets. This will also make it easier to add new > hardware targets. Isn't this going to place files in the installed system that do not belong to any packages and that will be hard to upgrade using 'apt-get upgrade'? -- Happy hacking Petter Reinholdtsen
