Hi Mattia, Mattia Rizzolo a écrit : > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 06:46:37PM +0100, Georges Khaznadar wrote: > > Mattia Rizzolo a écrit : > > > From our builds, we can only see 4 packages which fail to build due to > > > this: [...] > > > expeyes > > > https://bugs.debian.org/790103 > [...] > > 3- rebase the package gcc-avr on a newer version of gcc, which may be a > > hard work. Such a work seems to exist, for example at > > https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/avr-gcc/ since > > last July > > This is what should be done, really.
I had a look at this last option, but I miss knowledge to keep on with it: as I could guess, the current gcc-avr package is based on a frozen archive of gcc-4.8, which is modified by adding subtle modifications. Obviously, I can freeze an archive of gcc-5, but I cannot craft the modifications to turn it into an efficient compiler for avr. > > [...] The last [option] sounds like a good fix > > rather than a mere workaround. > > Maybe this is something (also) upstream should look at. > > > Which is your opinion about this? > > If everybody agrees on having avr-gcc deal with the whole CPPFLAGS is > what it's supposed to do, then this bug should be reassigned to it, and > a "affects" link be left. > If this flag will be added before avr-gcc gets fixed, simply disabling > reproducible/timeless is the best way forward. > IMHO. So I shall reassign bug #790103 to gcc-avr, and keep the suggested link to expeyes. As a matter of fact, I cannot push the severity such a bugreport higher than whishlist, as I cannot provide any help about the work to be done. Best regards, Georges. > > > -- > regards, > Mattia Rizzolo > > GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. > more about me: http://mapreri.org : :' : > Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` > Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- -- Georges KHAZNADAR et Jocelyne FOURNIER 22 rue des mouettes, 59240 Dunkerque France. Téléphone +33 (0)3 28 29 17 70
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
