On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 07:57:05PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 10/11/15 19:49, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > On 09/11/15 10:21, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> >> On 08/11/15 23:44, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
> >>> FTR, we're now down to just subversion, uwsgi and zeroc-ice.
> >>>
> >>> James and Antonio are making some progress with subversion in
> >>> #803589, but it appears to be more tricky (and upstream has no fix
> >>> yet).
> >>>
> >>> zeroc-ice has an upstream fix, but the delta is too large for me to
> >>> backport it as part of an NMU.
> >>>
> >>> Haven't heard back yet from the uwsgi team.
> >>
> >> Thanks for the update.
> >>
> >> You can make those bugs serious now as this is imminent. Let us know once
> >> subversion is fixed.
> > 
> > You can go ahead with the default switch.
> 
> ruby-defaults migrated over the weekend. I guess the next step is dropping
> ruby2.1 from the list of supported interpreters and then binNMUing the 
> packages
> that depend on both libruby2.1 and libruby2.2, so we can get rid of ruby2.1?

Yes. Do you want to create a new transition tracker for that, or change
the existing one?

-- 
Antonio Terceiro <terce...@debian.org>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to