On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 08:32:03PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 16/11/15 20:10, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 05:08:09PM -0200, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 07:57:05PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> >>> On 10/11/15 19:49, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> >>>> On 09/11/15 10:21, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> >>>>> On 08/11/15 23:44, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
> >>>>>> FTR, we're now down to just subversion, uwsgi and zeroc-ice.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> James and Antonio are making some progress with subversion in
> >>>>>> #803589, but it appears to be more tricky (and upstream has no fix
> >>>>>> yet).
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> zeroc-ice has an upstream fix, but the delta is too large for me to
> >>>>>> backport it as part of an NMU.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Haven't heard back yet from the uwsgi team.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks for the update.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You can make those bugs serious now as this is imminent. Let us know 
> >>>>> once
> >>>>> subversion is fixed.
> >>>>
> >>>> You can go ahead with the default switch.
> >>>
> >>> ruby-defaults migrated over the weekend. I guess the next step is dropping
> >>> ruby2.1 from the list of supported interpreters and then binNMUing the 
> >>> packages
> >>> that depend on both libruby2.1 and libruby2.2, so we can get rid of 
> >>> ruby2.1?
> >>
> >> Yes. Do you want to create a new transition tracker for that, or change
> >> the existing one?
> > 
> > FTR: ruby2.1 has already been removed from the the list in the
> > ruby-defaults that just went into testing, so we can start binNMUing
> > when we have a list of packages.
> 
> I can do these:
> 
> emilio@tatooine:~$ grep-dctrl -s Source:Package -n -F Depends libruby2.1 --and
> libruby2.2
> /var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.debian.org_debian_dists_unstable_main_binary-amd64_Packages
[...]

looks good to me

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to