Hi Stefan, On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 01:16:49PM +0100, Stefan Ahlers wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > > While I would have prefered to fix all bugs inside the package it is > > fine for me to care for the obviously more urgent problem first. > > I think, we should close this bug report as "won't be fixed" because it > should be better to push the Find script upstream to cmake. This way is > mentioned in the second point of https://wiki.debian.org/CMake.
Would you volunteer to do so? > > I wonder whether we should also rename the binary package to fix > > > > W: libquazip-qt5-1: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libquazip5-1 > > > > What do you think about renaming the package once we are doing some > > heavier changes on the packaging anyway? > > Yes, I think this is a good idea but we should push this package to > experimental and not to unstable because of the change of the suffix > from libquazip-qt5.so to libquazip5.so we destroy the dependency of the > tupi and marble-plugins package. And so we have to inform the > maintainers of those packages to check and rebuild them, or? While I'd consider this a mini-transition small enough to upload directly to unstable I wonder whether we need some more testing anyway with all the renaming. I pushed a change with the renamed packages. Please test and confirm that this works for you and I'll make up my mind meanwhile where to upload. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de