El 22/01/16 a las 23:47, Don Raikes escribió:
Hi,
I am willing to take the lead on resurrecting debian-live-rescue, but according
to this webpage:
http://syn.theti.ca/2015/06/23/debian-live-rescue-needs-some-love/comment-page-1/#comment-5665
I should start by trying to build a rescue image from the existing live-image
sources.
However, when I go to https://github.com/debian-live/live-images.git I cannot
find a branch that contains the old rescue build configuration.
Is this configuration laying around somewhere I can use as a starting point?
Take a look at:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-live/2014/08/msg00081.html
https://adrian15sgd.wordpress.com/2015/11/13/about-rescue-tools-in-gnulinux-systems-in-2014-draft/
(Find the configuration link you want there. ;) )
https://lists.debian.org/debian-live/2015/11/msg00075.html
On one night we discussed in #debian-live irc about this rescue image /
rescue blend and well. I leave you some bits here:
1) There was some discussion about the original dba plans on submitting
a tasksel-rescue package versus what it's currently used:
* task-rescue (task-* is official tasks maintained by the d-i team).
* blendname-tasks (Already used in blends for their specific stuff.)
What I mean is that my article begins with me trying to make a
tasksel-rescue package and it turns out that this package name not even
exists.
2) Ben Armstrong wanted to reuse some of the packages I used on
Rescatux. I warned him that Rescatux was graphical oriented and that I
left out some cli tools from it. Some sysadmins might consider using
grml instead of Rescatux for cli purposes just for that.
adrian15
--
Support free software. Donate to Super Grub Disk. Apoya el software
libre. Dona a Super Grub Disk. http://www.supergrubdisk.org/donate/