-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Martin Samuelsson a écrit : | tags - patch | thank you, | | Encolpe DEGOUTE @ 2006-01-06 (Friday), 10:37 (+0100) | |>Hi, |>first point, 0.4.7 is out, it may be fix in it. |>second point, I experiment this problem under 2.6.13, 2.6.14 and 2.6.15: |>http://www.bitsplitter.net/blog/?p=563 | | | I can't find any patch in your message, hence I'm removing the tag. Did | you tag it by mistake or did you forget to attach the patch? | | If following the link above to: | | http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/showthread.php?s=&threadid=369629&perpage=15&pagenumber=2
It's two year old ! This thread is 2.6.13 related and show another way: http://www.bitsplitter.net/blog/?p=563 | ...it gives me the impression that this bug is related to the ipw2200 | driver, and not to wpa_supplicant. Could you please clarify why it's not | related to the driver, if I'm getting it wrong. I found a PCMCIA card today, tested wpa_supplicant with ndiswrapper and it was working. I doesn't know if is ipw2200 driver or interaction with it, but I cannot use encryption with this driver since kernel 2.6.13. When I reported #340836, maintainer said that 2.6.15 use updated drivers for ipw2200 and ieee80211. I don't know how to debug wpa_supplicant in order to demonstrate that ipw2200 is the only responsible. Regards, - -- Encolpe DEGOUTE http://encolpe.degoute.free.fr/ Logiciels libres, hockey sur glace et autres activités cérébrales -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDwt5yvFPzBBlIZMMRAuepAJ0bK2ZbNzaNLYhZ69ZzsgfFtpVq5ACdFfpv dk47rQKrn0KP9CVpLljw7pE= =WRcV -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
