Hi, you missed the change on postrm, and BTW I think this is out of the NMU scope, can we please leave the change out? I'm not too confident about it, I would like to just rename the package and let xnox give his opinion on the postinst and postrm scripts.
maybe somebody on -mentors can give an opinion about what is wrong with this line "if [ -x /usr/sbin/update-initramfs ] && [ -e /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf ]" sorry! Gianfranco Il Venerdì 15 Aprile 2016 22:03, Nicholas D Steeves <nstee...@gmail.com> ha scritto: On 15 April 2016 at 09:25, Gianfranco Costamagna <locutusofb...@debian.org> wrote: > also some issues might be fixed in a later release > > http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/btrfs-progs/4.4.1-1.1/lintian > > I: btrfs-progs source: duplicate-short-description btrfs-tools btrfs-tools-dbg > I: btrfs-progs source: duplicate-long-description btrfs-tools btrfs-tools-dbg > W: btrfs-progs source: dbg-package-missing-depends btrfs-tools-dbg > > and take care of piuparts > http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/btrfs-progs/4.4.1-1.1/piuparts > > /var/lib/dpkg/info/btrfs-progs.postinst: 7: hash: update-initramfs: not > found P.S. I've reuploaded a package to mentors that uses command -v instead of hash. It should be available at the same URL as before, as soon as mentors finishes building it.