On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 05:20:17PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 09/24/2016 05:00 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 11:39:50AM +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote: > >> Apparently non-release architectures on ftp-master are still considered > >> for testing autoremoval. > > > > They aren't. They would be if they were in testing, but they are not. > > Are you sure about that? #836342 seems to suggest non-release > architectures are considered by the autoremoval script.
yes, for build-dep. In that case the package had this in build-dep:
clang-3.7 [kfreebsd-any],
libclang-3.7-dev [kfreebsd-any],
llvm-3.7-dev [kfreebsd-any],
clang-3.8 [!kfreebsd-any],
libclang-3.8-dev [!kfreebsd-any],
llvm-3.8-dev [!kfreebsd-any],
and the autorm for llvm 3.7 caught that package too, even if the
build-dep was limited to a non release arch only.
i.e.: a different thing :)
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
