On Tue 2016-11-08 01:58:42 -0600, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Daniel Kahn Gillmor <d...@fifthhorseman.net> (2016-11-07): >> On Thu 2016-11-03 06:56:21 -0600, Luca Falavigna wrote: >> > 2016-11-03 13:41 GMT+01:00 Thomas Goirand <z...@debian.org>: >> >> dkg, you had the intention to upload gnupg 2.1 to backports. Is there >> >> anything that's holding it? >> >> >> >> Lucas, could you upload a version of sbuild to BPO without this hard >> >> requirement, and maybe with the fix I suggested for the keygen thing? >> >> While not the definitive solution, this would fix it in the mean time. >> > >> > If Daniel is willing to upload gnupg2, that would be cool! Otherwise >> > I'll try to see which other alternatives we have. >> >> I'd be happy to upload gnupg2 2.1.15-8 to backports, but it's currently >> not migrating to testing, i think because of the current udeb freeze (we >> have gpgv-udeb). I'm adding kibi to the cc list here to see whether >> that's something he's ok with unblocking. > > Builds for the next d-i release have finished but still need testing; > I'll unblock packages once tests look good (so possibly a bit before the > announcement is published).
Thanks, KiBi! --dkg
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature