This is a dependence for gnusocial and gnusocial uses genericons. We first thought of going with gnereicons neue but then it may break gnusocial.
Or can we package both genericons and genericons neue? Or if gnusocial upstream is ok with gnereicons neue then should we drop packaging gnereicons. On 18 November 2016 5:16:42 AM IST, Vincent Blut <vincent.deb...@free.fr> wrote: >On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 05:35:16PM +0530, Bhuvan Krishna wrote: >>Package: wnpp >>Severity: wishlist >>Owner: Bhuvan Krishna <bhu...@swecha.net> >> >>* Package name : fonts-genericons >> Version : 3.4.1 >> Upstream Author : George Stephanis <georgestepha...@automattic.com> >>* URL : https://github.com/Automattic/Genericons#readme >>* License : GPL-2+ >> Description : vector icons embedded in a webfont >> >>Vector icons embedded in a webfont designed to be clean and simple >keeping with >>a generic aesthetic. Use for instant HiDPI or to easily change colors >on the >>fly. >> > >Hi, > >Upstream seems to recommend the use of Genericons Neue¹, so is there >any >reason to package legacy Genericons? > >Thanks for contributing, >Vincent > > >¹https://github.com/Automattic/genericons-neue -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
