On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 10:39:16AM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> > … you've been attacked.
> I beg to disagree. I doubt that M. Kshevetskiy has been, in this case,
> individually targeted for attack.

me too. and I never said he had been individually been attacked. I just
said he had been attacked.
 
> I am reopening this bug. It has been forwarded upstream, where I have
> brought more suggestions on how to improve the user experience here.

I'd suggest downgrade to important (at max, probably normal is better) 
and maybe also to tag it as "unreproducible" (as its not reliable
reproducible…) so that the package doesnt get kicked out of testing…


-- 
cheers,
        Holger

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to