On 2016-11-27 11:16:11, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 10:39:16AM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote: >> > … you've been attacked. >> I beg to disagree. I doubt that M. Kshevetskiy has been, in this case, >> individually targeted for attack. > > me too. and I never said he had been individually been attacked. I just > said he had been attacked.
Good point. It's just the error message explicitly says "you". :) >> I am reopening this bug. It has been forwarded upstream, where I have >> brought more suggestions on how to improve the user experience here. > > I'd suggest downgrade to important (at max, probably normal is better) > and maybe also to tag it as "unreproducible" (as its not reliable > reproducible…) so that the package doesnt get kicked out of testing… That's fine with me! A. -- I'm no longer accepting the things I cannot change. I'm changing the things I cannot accept. - Angela Davis