>>>>>  RV == Rémi Vanicat [2016-11-27]

RV> Hello, I would like to work on the new upstream version of AUCTeX,
RV> there are several things I wish to discuss first

Hello Rémi, first of all I'd like to thank for your interest and your
work.  At this moment I'm working on the auctex package with Norbert
Preining: you are welcome to join the effort, but we need to coordinate
ourselves.  You can find Norbert auctex git repository at
<git://anonscm.debian.org/users/preining/auctex.git>.  My plan is to
review Norbert work and pull from it.

RV> - there are two version,
RV> 1. the main AUCTeX site give me 11.89[1]
RV> 2. GNU elpa has 11.89.7[2]

RV> It seem more logical to use the latter, but it will change the source
RV> of the .orig

Thinking about it, my decision is to use 11.89 from the main AUCTeX
site.  We will think about GNU elpa in the future.

RV> - speaking about elpa, it would be neat to convert the packaging to
RV> dh-elpa[3][4] (even more if our upstream is GNU elpa).

See above.

RV> - Also I didn't yet look at why eperl was needed, could you give me any
RV> lead before I dive into history?

I started to use ePerl in 1999.  At that time either we had no helpers,
or I was not satisfied with what we had.  I used ePerl to add
configurable boilerplate chunks to my packages debian files.  By now
ePerl is just a convenience to add copyright stuff and manage certain
source comments.  It does not hurt, so just don't worry about it, work
on the source "*.eperl" files, and execute "debian/rules" if you feel
the need to update the tree (anyway, it will get automatically updated
as soon as you or your tools use debian/rules to build the package).

RV> - speaking about tooling, what tool are you using for maintaining
RV> AUCTeX, so I could coordinate with it?

GPB; see <https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/salve/auctex.git/>,
fetch the "auctex-plan" branch and read the "TODO.org" file, in
particular the section titled "Repository layout info".

RV> - I would also like to add myself to the uploader field, to make
RV> such a big change not a NMU

Let us first work together.  If we manage to coordinate, we will think
about it later.

RV> - For now, I will continue to use my anonscm.debian.org git repo[5],
RV> but it might be simpler to use collab-maint as git repository, if
RV> you agree on it.

For the moment I'd rather keep using
<https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/salve/auctex.git/> as the
official package repository.

-- 
Thanks,
Davide

Reply via email to