On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Jean Baptiste Favre <deb...@jbfavre.org> wrote: > Hello Adrian, > Thanks for the report. > > You're right, latest Trafficserver package switched from internal luajit > copy to system one. This change is intentional to ensure consistency > between libraries. >
Yep, so Adrian's report is correct to remove dangling binary packages of previous versions on those architectures, to allow the migration to testing of current version. > Since luajit is not yet available for arm64 architecture, Trafficserver > can't be built. > Problem is, embedded luajit couldn't be built on some architectures, > preventing Trafficserver to be available for those ones. > I choose to use system provided luajit instead of trying to patch > embedded one. > > I'm working on this issue to use liblua5-1-dev when luajit isn't available. > I hope I can come up with a solution within next week. > I think it would be better to upstream our changes about using external luajit, and we can rely on luajit maintainers and porters to provide as many as possible supported architectures in the mean time. What do you think? Thanks, Aron
