On 11/12/2016 09:52, Aron Xu wrote: > On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Jean Baptiste Favre <deb...@jbfavre.org> > wrote: >> Hello Adrian, >> Thanks for the report. >> >> You're right, latest Trafficserver package switched from internal luajit >> copy to system one. This change is intentional to ensure consistency >> between libraries. >> > > Yep, so Adrian's report is correct to remove dangling binary packages > of previous versions on those architectures, to allow the migration to > testing of current version.
OK, so I misunderstood the removal request. I thought Adrian was asking for Trafficserver latest version removal because of libluajit not being present on arm64. >> Since luajit is not yet available for arm64 architecture, Trafficserver >> can't be built. >> Problem is, embedded luajit couldn't be built on some architectures, >> preventing Trafficserver to be available for those ones. >> I choose to use system provided luajit instead of trying to patch >> embedded one. >> >> I'm working on this issue to use liblua5-1-dev when luajit isn't available. >> I hope I can come up with a solution within next week. >> > > I think it would be better to upstream our changes about using > external luajit, and we can rely on luajit maintainers and porters to > provide as many as possible supported architectures in the mean time. > What do you think? I obviously agree with that :) I'll upstream the changes as soon as I have a working solution for Debian. Cheers, Jean Baptiste
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
