Samuel Thibault, on Thu 12 Jan 2017 03:27:24 +0100, wrote: > I'm very surprised to see this 200 value, which means 200ms, while > studies have shown that "interactivity" is usually seen bad by humans > beyond 100ms. > > One thing we can do for Stretch is to reduce this value to something > acceptable. A low value make espeak-ng more CPU-intensive, but that > shouldn't be too harmful.
I have uploaded a -6 version with 50ms as default. I couldn't notice a difference between 50ms and 20ms or 10ms, while being much less CPU-intensive, and that seems coherent with the result of the studies :) Samuel
