On Tue, 2017 Mar 28 08:36+0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > > > > That installation would fail with a non clear message if the Java > > > support is not there. -> Bad. > > > > > > We had that "fun" in the past... > > > > So, there are Java-based LibreOffice extension packages that do not > > properly declare their Java dependencies? > > I didn't say "packages"? Extensions from the wild, from upstream, from > LOs extension website _in oxt format_.
If LibreOffice is installed without Java runtime support, then how is the failed installation of Java-based third-party extensions a problem? That is exactly what should happen. > > ...are in libobasis5.2-extension-report-builder-5.2.6.2-2.x86_64.rpm, > > not in libobasis5.2-core-5.2.6.2-2.x86_64.rpm. The situation is the > > same in 5.3. > > Hmm, then I misremember and need to dig out again why this was in the > metapackage... I'm curious...