On Sun, 2017-04-02 at 15:42 +0200, intrigeri wrote: > Hi, > > Ben Hutchings: > > How about "Breaks: busybox (<< 1:1.22.0-17~)"? I think that does the > > job.
(I actually include busybox-static in the Breaks field too.) > Yes :) At least it'll ensure that busybox, if installed, is the right > one (which is probably the best we can do as far as initramfs-tools is > concerned). Thanks! > > It won't ensure that busybox is installed when the cryptsetup hook > needs it though. But that's another problem, and as Guilhem pointed > out it's well tracked elsewhere already. Correct, but the installer ensures that that happens. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings It is impossible to make anything foolproof because fools are so ingenious.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
