Hi intigeri, hi Guilhem, Am 02.04.2017 um 10:10 schrieb Guilhem Moulin: > On Sun, 02 Apr 2017 at 09:50:55 +0200, intrigeri wrote: >> So at this point, I suggest this bug is reassigned to cryptsetup, and >> option 3 is implemented there. But downgrading to non-RC and leaving >> things as-is seems acceptable to me as well. >> >> Thoughts? > > I think the proper fix would be to split cryptsetup's initramfs bits to > a separate package (depending on busybox), cf. #783297. It's > unfortunate that we didn't implement that in time for Stretch, but > considering the impact of this, I'd favor downgrading the severity and > merging the bugs for the time being.
I fully agree with Guilhem here. We should split out cryptsetup-initramfs as soon as Stretch is released and make it depend on initramfs-tools and busybox. Cheers, jonas
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
