[Adding the bugreport back in the address field]
On 02/06/2018 06:56 PM, Joerg Schiermeier, Bielefeld/Germany wrote: > WineHQ | Debian Package > ================================ > stable version == wine > devel. version == wine-development > > Is this correct? Yes, that's correct. And it's what we are doing: wine: 1.8.x, 2.0.x, 3.0.x (all stable releases) wine-development: 2.1, 2.2, ..., 2.22, 3.0-rcx (all development releases, and release candidates) Maybe it's about the release candidates and where to put them? For the 1.8 release they were in wine, for 2.0 and 3.0 in wine-development. You wrote: > The version of 'wine-development' has to be minimum the version of > 'wine' and not below. This is correct 52 weeks a year, but not when the stable release is the most recent release. So if the latest release is 3.0 (stable) and the previous release 3.0-rc6 (development) then we will (and did) ship a higher version number in wine: wine/3.0-1 wine-development/3.0~rc6-1 > If not you may close this bug as solved/won't fix please. I'll close it with wine-development/3.1-1. Still, I'd love to understand what this bug was about. Greets jre