Le 10/02/2018 à 01:08, Nicholas D Steeves a écrit : > On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 11:24:48AM +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: >> On 17/01/2018 16:55, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: >>> Le 19/12/2017 à 01:59, Nicholas D Steeves a écrit : >>>> Hi Sylvestre, >>>> >>>> On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 08:57:39AM +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: >>>>> Hello >>>>> >>>>> Don't hesitate if you need help! >>>>> >>>>> S >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Thanks for the support :-) Would it be alright if I switch to using >>>> more modern dh sphynxdoc magic, package-doc.install files instead of >>>> the current d/rules method? I don't think it will need debhelper 10, >>>> but I have to look into it some more. >>>> >>>> Oh! One thing that would make this much faster would be knowing how >>>> to build just the documentation. Each run is currently very slow, >>>> because it builds all of llvm-toolchain. >>>> >>>> Other than that, please ping me in a month if I haven't yet submitted >>>> anything. >>> ping :) >>> >>> (almost a month and I saw that in my build :) >> One more time :) >> >> (I wont bother you anymore after this ping) >> >> S >> > Thank you for pinging me! Sorry I'm making such slow progress... > > Unfortunately debian/rules build_doc doesn't work because the > build-llvm target dir isn't created for build_doc. I also tried > 'make -f debian/rules build_doc'. > > I've also recently encountered several different FTBS > (llvm-toolchain-5.0 building for sid) depending on how I built the > package. eg: gbp due to patch fuzz, dpkg-buildpackage inside of a > chroot due to a failing self-test (log attached. Identical failure to > when using pdebuild), sbuild (I'll need to try this one again to catch > the log)... I've attached another FTBS log, but I don't remember > which method I was using to build that one, and I'm particularly > perplexed where llvm-toolchain-5.0_5.0.1.orig.tar.bz2 came from... It > was a link to llvm-toolchain-5.0_5.0.1.orig.tar.gz. I think dget > generated it. > > Should I target a different version of llvm-toolchain? I'm not sure > how I can make any progress on this bug with these various FTBS > issues...
This is caused by a recent change in gold I think. Just add a ; XFAIL: * at in the test to silent it. BTW, in the future, please don't attach the full build log: We just need the error message. S