2018-03-31 20:20 GMT+02:00 Sven Joachim <svenj...@gmx.de>: > On 2018-03-31 19:56 +0200, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote: > >> I think shlib bumping is a better plan than waiting for an unknown >> time in the NEW queue, although for new binary package names it's >> usually a short wait. > > If you have a libcwidget4 package ready, don't hesitate to upload it to > experimental. This gives me at least something to show in bug #894049, > where I haven't received a reply yet.
I don't have it ready, but I imagine that it's not too much work either way. I wanted to include other changes in parallel, but didn't have time to prepare it. So I think that shlib bumping is a better route at this point. About copying to #894049, I tought about replying to that bug report instead, to show RMs that we're ready to go. Feel free to point to it, or tell me and I will reply to the other bug myself. >> So I have to wait to upload cwidget until the new ncurses gets the >> green light and enters unstable, right? > > For uploads to unstable, yes. This holds for both plans (SONAME change or > shlibs bump + Breaks against aptitude). Right, so I can prepare this within a day, for both cwidget and aptitude. Cheers. -- Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
