#include <hallo.h> * Richard Burton [Sat, Mar 11 2006, 11:00:07AM]: > > >From: Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Package: apt-cacher > >Which version? > > Sorry, filed the report on another machine so it didn't pick it up. > Version is 1.5.3 (latest unstable). > > >Bad. There are checks to prevent exactly this. The only scenario where I > >can imagine this happening: > > > > - the server delivered empty files with OK status code > > - you have hit a bug in LWP (the file download backend) and it > > propagated the error code incorrectly? > > I suspect there is no easy way to tell which, which would make it harder to > fix. Maybe an option to make certain repositories required, so cleanup wont > take place if there isn't a valid packages file for that repository? > > > >This all should become a little bit more reliable with apt-cacher II. > > Excellent, when is this due?
Approx. end of March. The design is mostly done but I have not time for coding. Eduard. -- <HE> Lalalala ... Ich bin die Sponsoren-Schlampe - Wer hat heute Lust? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
