On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 10:11 AM Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <po...@debian.org> wrote:
> On 09/01/2019 01:27, Jose Luis Rivero wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: transition > > > > Dear release team: > > > > simbody 3.6.1+dfsg-1 is now in experimental, we can start the transition > > for the existing package in the archive currently using it. > > The following source package need to be rebuild: > > > > gazebo 9.6.0-1 > > > > I think that in terms of 'ben' lingo, the transition has the following > > parameters: > > > > Affected: .depends ~ > /\b(libsimbody3\.6|libsimbody3\.5v5|libsimbody3\.5v5\-dbg)\b/ > > Good: .depends ~ /\b(libsimbody3\.6)\b/ > > Bad: .depends ~ /\b(libsimbody3\.5v5|libsimbody3\.5v5\-dbg)\b/ > > > > Sorry for sending this close to the freeze but it will kill the 2 RC > bugs pending on Simbody. > > Please schedule binNMUs for gazebo packages on all architectures. > > simbody failed to build on several architectures: > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=simbody&suite=experimental > > Please fix that before we consider starting the transition. I've upload simbody 3.6.1+dfsg-3 which: - fixed: all, mips, powerpc, powerpcspe, ppc64el, ppc64 - waiting but probably fixed: mipsel, mips64el, kfreebad-amd64 - still failing: i386, hurd-i386 The build is failing on i368 (will require a bit more of work) but it is already failing on unstable so there is a big gain on architectures supported (+6 at least) and no regression as far as I can say. Thanks Emilio.
