simbody 3.6.1+dfsg-5 has been uploaded to unstable. On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 3:30 PM Jose Luis Rivero <jriv...@openrobotics.org> wrote:
> Hello Emilio: > > There were a couple of patches: one to fix the architecture detection > which fixed most of the BSD and ppc friends. The other, as you said, is not > properly a patch but it tries to workaround about problems (most of them on > i386) that I'm unable to diagnostic and will require my interaction with > upstream. Note that i386 is still failing so the workaround does not change > too much the status of the ports. I agree with your conclusions, the change > improves current situation in sid but the whole thing needs more work. > > With respect to gazebo, I launched ratt against this new version and seems > to be happy: > > https://build.osrfoundation.org/job/debian-ratt-builder/19/consoleFull#console-section-8 > > Thanks, > Jose. > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 1:58 PM Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <po...@debian.org> > wrote: > >> Control: tags -1 confirmed >> >> On 10/01/2019 12:16, Jose Luis Rivero wrote: >> > On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 10:11 AM Emilio Pozuelo Monfort < >> po...@debian.org> >> > wrote: >> > >> >> On 09/01/2019 01:27, Jose Luis Rivero wrote: >> >>> Package: release.debian.org >> >>> Severity: normal >> >>> User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org >> >>> Usertags: transition >> >>> >> >>> Dear release team: >> >>> >> >>> simbody 3.6.1+dfsg-1 is now in experimental, we can start the >> transition >> >>> for the existing package in the archive currently using it. >> >>> The following source package need to be rebuild: >> >>> >> >>> gazebo 9.6.0-1 >> >>> >> >>> I think that in terms of 'ben' lingo, the transition has the following >> >>> parameters: >> >>> >> >>> Affected: .depends ~ >> >> /\b(libsimbody3\.6|libsimbody3\.5v5|libsimbody3\.5v5\-dbg)\b/ >> >>> Good: .depends ~ /\b(libsimbody3\.6)\b/ >> >>> Bad: .depends ~ /\b(libsimbody3\.5v5|libsimbody3\.5v5\-dbg)\b/ >> >>> >> >>> Sorry for sending this close to the freeze but it will kill the 2 RC >> >> bugs pending on Simbody. >> >>> Please schedule binNMUs for gazebo packages on all architectures. >> >> >> >> simbody failed to build on several architectures: >> >> >> >> >> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=simbody&suite=experimental >> >> >> >> Please fix that before we consider starting the transition. >> > >> > >> > I've upload simbody 3.6.1+dfsg-3 which: >> > - fixed: all, mips, powerpc, powerpcspe, ppc64el, ppc64 >> > - waiting but probably fixed: mipsel, mips64el, kfreebad-amd64 >> > - still failing: i386, hurd-i386 >> > >> > The build is failing on i368 (will require a bit more of work) but it is >> > already failing on unstable so there is a big gain on architectures >> > supported (+6 at least) and no regression as far as I can say. >> My concern here is that the way to fix the build on all those >> architectures was >> by ignoring the failing tests. If the test cases themselves are buggy then >> that's fine (though it'd be good to forward that upstream and get the >> tests >> fixed). However the tests may be failing due to bugs in the underlying >> library >> code, in which case ignoring them is not really a fix. >> >> In any case the situation in sid is bad too as you said and I imagine >> that the >> version in testing (which seems quite similar to the one in sid) would be >> affected by these build failure problems too, so I guess we should go >> ahead with >> this version. >> >> BTW I assumed that gazebo builds fine against this new simbody, is that >> right? >> If not, that is obviously a blocker. If it builds fine, then go ahead and >> look >> into the remaining build issues. >> >> Cheers, >> Emilio >> >
