On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:02:15PM -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On 02/16/2011 11:32 AM, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > > I would propose to either skip the "basic" test suite if the length of pwd > > is > > below a threshold or to run the testsuite in > > (mktemp -d /tmp/mstest.XXXXXXXXX) rightaway. > > one downside of running the testsuite under /tmp (assuming that it's > even possible) is that the usual permissions for /tmp (01777) are too > loose for sshd to accept files in there as legitimate authorizedkeys files. > > as a result, the test suite will run with StrictModes off, which > effectively disables some features of the test suite (meaning less > coverage). bleah. > > i guess it's better than no test suite coverage at all, though.
agreed. also, do note that even if socat would magically be fixed (and it can't), gpg-agent would be the next to fail (#847206). i stumbled upon this in another package (#920387). a. -- For every complex problem, there is an answer that is clear, simple - and wrong. - H.L. Mencken
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature