#include <hallo.h>
* Joerg Schilling [Sat, Mar 18 2006, 04:05:49PM]:
> Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > #include <hallo.h>
> > * Joerg Schilling [Sat, Mar 18 2006, 01:09:03PM]:
> > > The cdrtools distribution is compiled from several 
> > > different "works".
> > > 
> > > One complete and separate work is the Schily Makefilesystem.
> > > It is independent of a specific project and published under th CDDL.
> >
> > You are free to double-license it. Look at the Perl project if you need
> > a "big reference".
> 
> If the GPL is a free license acording to the Debian Social Contract 
> there is no need to do this......

Joerg, please stop that. You have already proved by your recent actions
that you DO NOT understand the GPL. Don't try to justify your "claims"
with another document that is neither understood by you nor is really
your business.

> Note that the Schily Makefilesystem is a different "work" and just published
> together the rest of the cdrtools. If the GPL _really_ insists in polluting

I reallize that. Guess why I suggested double-licensing.

> _other_ software, the GPL must be considered unfree and should be banned from
> Debian.

We have already decided how far a viral license is allowed to affect
other components. GPL enforces the freedom of "poluted" software, while
your license does the opposite. If you don't think so, read and
understand the DFSG before claiming _anything_ based on its contents.
And I mean reading the whole thing, please don't cite few sentences
prooving only your point (as you like to do, IIRC).

Eduard.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to