On 04.03.19 13:29, Andrej Shadura wrote: > On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 10:21:02 +0100 Andrej Shadura > <andrew.shad...@collabora.co.uk> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> The same issue as #861183 is found in binutils, when built with OBS, it >> generates files inside the tarball looking like this: >> >> -rw-r--r-- root/root 959 2018-06-24 20:38 BUILD/bfd/aout32.c >> -rw-r--r-- root/root 1097 2018-06-24 20:38 BUILD/bfd/aout64.c >> -rw-r--r-- root/root 166798 2018-06-24 20:38 BUILD/bfd/aoutx.h >> -rw-r--r-- root/root 14034 2018-12-14 20:22 BUILD/bfd/arc-got.h >> -rw-r--r-- root/root 3973 2018-06-24 20:38 BUILD/bfd/arc-plt.def >> -rw-r--r-- root/root 4665 2018-06-24 20:38 BUILD/bfd/arc-plt.h >> >> Arguably this is something OBS could have changed, but one can run into >> this issue by just building the package locally in a directory not >> matching what dpkg-source creates. >> >> Anyway, I hope the attached patch solves the issue. I’m currently >> testing it building binutils and binutils-mingw64; I will post the >> update as I confirm it indeed fixes the issue. > > Matthias, have you had time to have a look at this? I know this is a low > priority thing, but nevertheless it’d be cool to know what you think.
No, afraid that this will break the current cross-toolchain-base* packages. Did you test build these?
