On Mon, 29 Apr 2019 15:44:39 +0200 Santiago Vila <sanv...@unex.es> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 01:22:18PM +0000, Holger Levsen wrote: > > if we now could please focus on #928172 and ignore #927450 for now, > > that would be great. (and "ignoring #927450" also means not mixing them > > up.) > > Let's focus on #928172 if you like. I try not to mix them up, but I > believe they are strongly related in the sense that the reason #928172 > is serious now is that the package in stable still has #927450.
so, I'm currently in this situation where the package doesn't upgrade. and nothing else upgrades either because of this. is there a known way to work around the issue that the hook encounters in order to unblock my install?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
