On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 11:15 AM Sean Whitton <spwhit...@spwhitton.name> wrote: > > I think that the wording for this change should reflect the above > (unless I've misunderstood David), such that the new wording cannot be > misinterpreted to mean that the sysvinit requirement does not apply to > any package using any systemd component.
That would resolve my issue, though I am not sold on the value of the additional specificity. I'll say no more than this - If I am operating in good faith, the additional language is not necessary. If I am not, it won't stop me. Dave
