Control: tags -1 + bullseye sid
On Fri, 23 Aug 2019 at 10:04:28 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Setting up fuse (2.9.9-1) ...
> dpkg: error processing package fuse (--configure):
> installed fuse package post-installation script subprocess returned error
> exit status 1
...
> # udevadm test --action -p /devices/virtual/misc/fuse
> Invalid action '-p'
Similar to the equivalent fuse3 bug #934293, this seems to be a regression
since buster: the same binary package installs OK on buster. Maybe
udevadm became more strict about its parameter parsing?
Similar to fuse3, it would be helpful if the maintainer script had less
"> /dev/null 2>&1" so that error messages would appear.
> I'm not exactly sure what this code is supposed to achieve.
> Since fuse no longer ships its own udev rules, maybe it can be dropped
> altogether?
Or if the postinst is still necessary, maybe fuse3 could take over the
fuse binary package name for bullseye (with a transitional package) so that
bugs like this one don't need to be fixed in both places?
smcv
