On Mon, 2020-02-03 at 21:10 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 2/1/20 10:53 AM, Hagen Paul Pfeifer wrote: > > Package: binutils-dev > > Version: 2.33.90.20200122-2 > > Severity: important > > > > Dear Maintainer, > > > > linux perf build fails with current version of binutils-dev: > > please can you reassign that to the appropriate package? both libopcodes and > libbfd have non-public interfaces. If you use those, please adopt to these.
Note that for linux-perf binary packages we don't use libbfd since the licences are incompatible. So this could only be minor for src:linux (and I won't do anything to fix it). Ben. -- Ben Hutchings If at first you don't succeed, you're doing about average.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
