CCed: Stephen Rothwell * Matthias Klose | 2020-02-03 21:10:14 [+0100]:
Hey Matthias >please can you reassign that to the appropriate package? both libopcodes and >libbfd have non-public interfaces. If you use those, please adopt to these. I don't get it: `apt-file search /usr/include/bfd.h` results in binutils-dev: /usr/include/bfd.h On an slightly older bullseye the shipped version of bfd.h building perf works like a charm. I don't get it why the currently shipped version of bfd.h by binutils-dev/bullseye should be fine? bfd.h looks broken now because they break API compatibility by silently removing previously defined public functions. libbfd-dev is an meta-package and provided by binutils-dev. I don't get the correlation to the bug. It seems other people (kernel folks, Stephen) have the identical error as well: https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/1/30/1005 Stephen: or is the bug fixed somewhere else? Do you have an workaround?a Thank you Matthias for the quick response! Hagen
