Hi, On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 11:56:00AM -0400, Sandro Tosi wrote: > On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 3:01 AM Michael Banck <mba...@debian.org> wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 03:33:34PM -0400, Sandro Tosi wrote: > > > I believe this package should be removed: > > > > > > * python2-only > > > * no upstream release since 2004 (!) or svn update since 2005 (!) > > > * it's keeping several python2 modules in debian that could be dropped if > > > jack > > > is removed too > > > * several alternatives exist that are much more populare than jack > > > > > > if i dont hear back within a week with a good reason to keep this > > > package, i'll > > > file for its removal. > > > > I find a week way too short for these kind of things, especially in the > > current conditions. > > I set a week of time for an *answer*, not to do the actual work. > > i think i did not see what you think about the removal of jack: is it > worth to keep a 15 years old application in debian (which transitively > keeps in the archive several python2 packages, that could be dropped > as soon as jack is removed)? are you planning on porting it to python3 > (i googled if a port was already available but i couldnt find any)? if > so, did you start already? where can we track progress?
Dude, I'm trying to keep my family alive right now. If you think removing jack will save the world, by all means, go for it. Michael
