On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 06:29:34PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: Hi Andreas,
> Reopening seems to be make-work if you are in the process of adopting > anyway. ;-) Ok! :) > cu Andreas > > > [1] Worried is too strong. But the rationale for closing made no sense. I > submitted a bugreport with a diff for the NMU to make it available to > the maintainer and track its integration. Closing it with "a package > that contains the diff already entered the Debian archive" did not make > sense, since the only package in the archive with the diff is still the > NMU, so the status of the package had not changed at all since I had > submitted the tracking bug report. Sorry for "worried" lol. As English is not my first language, sometimes I make a poor choice of words. As for the rationale for closing, maybe I misinterpreted what was stated on the Debian wiki about BTS usage [1] in this case, but I see your point now. I should have deferred closing the bug after the new revision I am working on was accepted on unstable. All those processes are still new to me, so I'm unfortunately still making some mistakes along the way. Sorry for the inconvenience and thanks for the explanation! [1] https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing Regards, David Polverari.
