Hey,

parallel to Michel's very nice work to get chromium into unstable
(thanks to him!), I tried to build the current version in a buster
chroot. At the moment I struggle that there seems a difference how
SFINAE[1] in a special case [2] is handled different between buster's
and unstable's clang version. Since I had not so much time I have not
found a fix to work around this.

If people are more experienced with C++ templates than me, I would be
happy to share the problem and the build log ;)

Best,
Jan

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Substitution_failure_is_not_an_error

[2]

In file included from
../../third_party/blink/common/privacy_budget/identifiability_metric_builder.cc:5:
In file included from
../../third_party/blink/public/common/privacy_budget/identifiability_metric_builder.h:9:
In file included from
/usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/8/../../../../include/c++/8/vector:60:
In file included from
/usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/8/../../../../include/c++/8/bits/stl_algobase.h:64:
In file included from
/usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/8/../../../../include/c++/8/bits/stl_pair.h:59:
In file included from
/usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/8/../../../../include/c++/8/bits/move.h:55:
/usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/8/../../../../include/c++/8/type_traits:2046:15:
error: only enumeration types
have underlying types
      typedef __underlying_type(_Tp) type;
              ^
../../third_party/blink/public/common/privacy_budget/identifiable_token.h:121:40:
note: in instantiation of template
 class 'std::underlying_type<base::span<const unsigned char,
18446744073709551615> >' requested here
            typename U = typename std::underlying_type<T>::type,

Am 23.12.20 um 12:13 schrieb Tomas Pospisek:
> Hi all,
> 
> now that sid has seen an update of Chromium to v87 (hooray and thanks
> everybody!) does anybody know it there's activity or plans towards
> updating chromium in Debian stable?
> 
> Chromium from sid is not installable in Debian stable due to
> 
>     Depends: libc6 (>= 2.29)
> 
> whereas stable has 2.28.
> 
> I'm not sure what the correct procedure would be to kickstart the Debian
> stable update?
> 
> *t

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to