In that case, a massive bin-NMU of GNOME packages might be in order. Thanks! Martin-Éric
ma 25. tammik. 2021 klo 19.06 Michael Biebl ([email protected]) kirjoitti: > > Am 25.01.21 um 18:05 schrieb Michael Biebl: > > Am 25.01.21 um 17:55 schrieb Martin-Éric Racine: > > > Package: network-manager-gnome > > > Version: 1.18.0-1 > > > Severity: important > > > > >> Package: libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 > >> Version: 2.40.2-2 > >> Depends: libgdk-pixbuf-2.0-0 (>= 2.40.0), libgdk-pixbuf-xlib-2.0-0 (>= > >> 2.40.2-2) > >> Description-en: GDK Pixbuf library (transitional package) > >> This transitional package depends on the main library > >> libgdk-pixbuf-2.0-0 > >> and the deprecated Xlib integration library libgdk-pixbuf-xlib-2.0-0. > >> . > >> Packages that only require the main library should depend on > >> libgdk-pixbuf-2.0-0 | libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0. > >> . > >> Packages that require the Xlib integration should port away from it, > >> or until that can be done, depend on > >> libgdk-pixbuf-xlib-2.0-0 | libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0. > >> > > > > Those dependencies are generated automatically, so I don't think it > > makes sense to file bug reports against individual packages. > > See also #981023 > > > > If those issues can be solved via binNMUs, they should be filed against > > release.debian.org > > > > See > https://salsa.debian.org/utopia-team/network-manager-applet/-/blob/debian/master/debian/control > > There is no explicit libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 dependency there. > I.e., I as maintainer, can do nothing about this. > > Regards, > Michael >
