Hi Martin-Éric can you please coordinate that with Simon. I think he has been driving this effort.
Regards, Michael Am 25.01.21 um 18:22 schrieb Martin-Éric Racine:
In that case, a massive bin-NMU of GNOME packages might be in order. Thanks! Martin-Éric ma 25. tammik. 2021 klo 19.06 Michael Biebl ([email protected]) kirjoitti:Am 25.01.21 um 18:05 schrieb Michael Biebl:Am 25.01.21 um 17:55 schrieb Martin-Éric Racine: > Package: network-manager-gnome > Version: 1.18.0-1 > Severity: important >Package: libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 Version: 2.40.2-2 Depends: libgdk-pixbuf-2.0-0 (>= 2.40.0), libgdk-pixbuf-xlib-2.0-0 (>= 2.40.2-2) Description-en: GDK Pixbuf library (transitional package) This transitional package depends on the main library libgdk-pixbuf-2.0-0 and the deprecated Xlib integration library libgdk-pixbuf-xlib-2.0-0. . Packages that only require the main library should depend on libgdk-pixbuf-2.0-0 | libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0. . Packages that require the Xlib integration should port away from it, or until that can be done, depend on libgdk-pixbuf-xlib-2.0-0 | libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0.Those dependencies are generated automatically, so I don't think it makes sense to file bug reports against individual packages. See also #981023 If those issues can be solved via binNMUs, they should be filed against release.debian.orgSee https://salsa.debian.org/utopia-team/network-manager-applet/-/blob/debian/master/debian/control There is no explicit libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 dependency there. I.e., I as maintainer, can do nothing about this. Regards, Michael
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
