Hi Paul, Paul Gevers, on 2021-09-15: > On 15-09-2021 18:51, Étienne Mollier wrote: > > I intend to adjust the d/tests/control Architecture field of > > resfinder to match the (pending upload) list of architectures > > supported by kma. Would this be sufficient to bring back > > resfinder to testing, or is there some knob to twiddle on CI end > > to make sure the absence of test is not a regression anymore? > > If resfinder depends on kma, then britney (the Release Team migration > software) *should* do the right thing. But it probably has a bug in this > area. So either you add the Architecture field and be done with it (for > now) or we override it on the Release Team side of things until britney > is fixed.
Thanks for your explanation! I prepare uploads to unstable, so architecture specifications in kma and resfinder match the reality of the field (in d/control and d/tests/control respectively). Besides, it should make the current situation a wee bit clearer for human beings, such as future self. Have a nice day, :) -- Étienne Mollier <emoll...@emlwks999.eu> Fingerprint: 8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c 8236 793c f67e 8f0d 11da Sent from /dev/pts/4, please excuse my verbosity.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
