Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Tue, 2021-11-23 at 14:34 +0100, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> The LVBAG driver in GDAL 3.2.2 is unable to process BAG 2.0 Extract
> files
> correctly. Since October 2021 BAG 1.0 Extract files are no longer
> updated,
> so users are expected to switch their processing to BAG 2.0.
>
> GDAL 3.3.0 and 3.4.0 contain changes required to process BAG 2.0
> Extract
> files correctly.
>
diff -Nru
gdal-3.2.2+dfsg/debian/patches/0001-Add-a-cppcheck_2004-CI-target-and-fix-related-issues.patch
gdal-3.2.2+dfsg/debian/patches/0001-Add-a-cppcheck_2004-CI-target-and-fix-related-issues.patch
---
gdal-3.2.2+dfsg/debian/patches/0001-Add-a-cppcheck_2004-CI-target-and-fix-related-issues.patch
1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100
+++
gdal-3.2.2+dfsg/debian/patches/0001-Add-a-cppcheck_2004-CI-target-and-fix-related-issues.patch
2021-11-23 10:11:54.000000000 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
+Description: Add a cppcheck_2004 CI target, and fix related issues
+Author: Even Rouault <even.roua...@spatialys.com>
+Origin:
https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/commit/6ff924dfc704776cbdeff1e0e23da6452cf06933
+Bug: https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/3516
+
+--- a/ogr/ogrsf_frmts/lvbag/ogrlvbaglayer.cpp
++++ b/ogr/ogrsf_frmts/lvbag/ogrlvbaglayer.cpp
This is a little confusing. The upstream commit in question touches 24
files, but this patch only changes one. Is that intentional? If so, the
patch header could do with some more information, because it doesn't
appear that the patch actually includes the change mentioned in the
description.
Regards,
Adam
